Back to Our Work
|
Fashion

Fashion: AI Design Prototyping Platform

1. Problem

1a. Statement

Fashion brands spend 6-12 months on design-to-production cycles, with physical prototyping costing $500-2000 per sample and 70% of samples never reaching production. A New York fashion tech startup needed an AI platform to generate manufacturing-ready technical specifications from designer sketches, reducing the iteration cost that forces emerging brands to limit their collections. The platform needed to output garment patterns, bill of materials, and construction specifications that manufacturers could use directly.

1b. Client Profile
TypeFashion Tech Startup
IndustryFashion
SizeSmall
RegionNew York, United States
Users150+
1c. Motivation
Fashion Designers
6-12 month cycles limiting creative iteration
Brand Founders
$500-2000 per sample with 70% never produced
Pattern Makers
Translating sketches to patterns manually
Manufacturers
Incomplete specs requiring back-and-forth clarification
Sustainability Teams
Material waste from unused physical samples
Emerging Brands
Cannot afford extensive prototyping on limited budgets

2. Analysis

2a. Requirements

The platform required a finetuned diffusion model trained on fashion design sketches, technical flats, and production specifications. Given a designer sketch or concept description, the system generated technical specifications including graded pattern pieces, seam allowances, and construction details. Bill of materials outputs listed fabric requirements, trims, and hardware with quantity calculations by size. The architecture needed to understand garment construction logic, ensuring generated patterns were manufacturable with proper ease, dart placement, and seam engineering. Output formats required compatibility with PLM systems and CAD software used by manufacturing partners.

2b. Constraints
Accuracy:Pattern outputs must be manufacturable without modification
Training Data:Limited labeled fashion tech pack datasets available
Output Format:Compatible with Gerber, Optitex, and Browzwear systems
Customization:Support brand-specific construction standards
IP Protection:Training data and outputs must remain confidential
Speed:Generate specs within minutes, not days

3. Solution

3a. Architecture
3b. Implementation
Discovery
4 weeks
Development
16 weeks
Integration
6 weeks
Deployment
3 weeks

4. Result

4a. DUBEScore™
4.3/5
D - Delivery4.3
U - Utility4.4
B - Business4.5
E - Endurance4.1
4b. Outcomes
Spec generation time< 15 minutes
Pattern accuracy89%
Sample cost reduction-75%
Design iterations per collection+300%
Designers on platform150+
Collections launched40+
4c. Learnings
1

Training data curation was 40% of development time. Partner with fashion schools for labeled datasets.

2

Pattern grading rules varied by garment category. Build separate models for tops, bottoms, and outerwear.

3

Designer feedback loops improved output quality rapidly. Ship early and iterate on real usage.

Ready to Build Your AI Solution?

Let's discuss how we can deliver similar results for your organization.